Prior to reporting on the endangered status of sharks, a few introductory shark facts might be in order.
Sharks belong to a distinct class (Chondrichthyes) of sea creatures, separate from fish. All sharks share the general physical traits of having rough, scaleless skin that covers a cartilage skeleton. They range in size from the less than one foot long pygmy shark to the forty foot long whale shark.
|More Ocean Resources
Over one-half (55.8% of global) of all the world's shark species, some 278 species, are categorized as deep water sharks, or sharks that live 200 meters below the ocean's surface.
With 119 documented species, catsharks (Family Scyliorhinidae) comprise the largest group of of deep water sharks.
Most people consider sharks as ocean villains. Perhaps for that reason, declining shark populations receive less than adequate attention.
The Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) promoted one of the earliest shark conservation efforts, developing anInternational Plan of Action for the Conservation of Sharks, built on the principle of states voluntarily creating shark management plans for their territorial waters.
Despite this early conservation effort, shark populations continue to decline. The latest Atlantic Shark Study, for example, notes.
The release of the first ever IUCN Red List of Threatened Species assessment of northeast Atlantic sharks, rays and chimaeras reveals that 26 percent are threatened with extinction and another 20 percent are in the Near Threatened category.
Their popularity as a food source contributes to their population decline. A 2011 study by the FAO concludes that shark fishing is big business.
The global values of shark landings from the FAO Fisheries Commodities database (FAO, 2010b) rose from around US$400 million in 1990 to over US$1 billion in 2000, declining to around US$800 million in 2006 (Figure 4). The value of shark landings in Asia far surpassed that of all other areas together because six of the top ten countries landing sharks are in Asia. Also Hong Kong has been the centre of the shark fin trade, and shark fins are the most valuable shark product by far.
Addressing the problems of declining shark populations takes many forms, including bans on the serving of shark fin soup. California, for example, passed a law in 2011 prohibiting the serving of shark fin soup in restaurants. In other areas of the world, the debatecontinues over banning the practice of shark finning.
Because many shark species swim in oceans that cross state boundaries, devising a workable shark management plan faces many roadblocks. The issue of declining shark populations extends beyond the loss of a couple of species, it possibly means large scale changes in ocean ecosystems.
Their status as predators at the top of the ocean food chain means declining shark populations often correlate with increases in the populations of their preferred prey. A chain reaction sets in with the increased population of lesser predators causing decreases in populations of their (the lesser predators) prey.
Reports on declines in the bay scallop fishing industry, for example, are linked to decreases in the Atlantic shark population. As shark populations declined, the populations of one of their preferred preys, Cownose rays, increased. The cownose rays then began feeding unimpeded on the bay scallop populations.
Often considered physical oddities, the coastal lifestyle and appearance of hammerhead sharks (Sphyrnidae) continues to intrigue their human observers.
Why did they evolve to have long, flat heads?
Without any data to back it up, the casual observer might easily hypothesize that the long, flat heads provide them with better eyesight.
Recent research published in the Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 4010-4018, confirms what many casual observers suspected.
Not only do the wide set eyes of hammerhead sharks provide them with better forward looking depth perception of ocean objects, but also the eyes set on the sides of their heads provide them with better backward looking ability.
One hammerhead species, the scalloped hammerhead, was measured as having a full 360o visual field.
The research results appear to mesh with another line of inquiry into the shape of the hammerhead shark's head. According to research presented in the Journal Copeia Vol. 1995, No. 2, the head of the hammerhead shark also evolved to help it with improved mobility.
The author states, "The present results, together with observation of their swimming behavior, strongly suggest that the hammerhead sharks utilize their head for hydrodynamic purposes in various ways."
Taken together the research suggests that the mystery of the hammerhead shark can be explained as an evolutionary process that provided them with the dual ability to more effectively see potential food sources and more effectively maneuver their bodies to catch the prey once sighted.
© 2013-2014. Patricia A. Michaels